|
One News Now:
PERSPECTIVES: Intellectuals
by Thomas Sowell - Syndicated Columnist
OneNewsNow.com
November 11, 2008
Among the
many wonders to be expected from an Obama administration, if Nicholas D.
Kristof of the New York Times is to be believed, is ending "the
anti-intellectualism that has long been a strain in American life."
He cited Adlai
Stevenson, the suave and debonair governor of Illinois, who twice ran for
president against Eisenhower in the 1950s, as an example of an
intellectual in politics.
Intellectuals, according to Mr. Kristof, are people who are "interested in
ideas and comfortable with complexity," people who "read the classics."
It is hard to know whether to laugh or cry.
Adlai Stevenson
was certainly regarded as an intellectual by intellectuals in the 1950s.
But, half a century later, facts paint a very different picture.
Historian Michael Beschloss, among others, has noted that Stevenson "could
go quite happily for months or years without picking up a book." But
Stevenson had the airs of an intellectual -- the form, rather than the
substance.
What is more telling, form was enough to impress the intellectuals, not
only then but even now, years after the facts have been revealed, though
apparently not to Mr. Kristof.
That is one of many reasons why intellectuals are not taken as seriously
by others as they take themselves.
As for reading the classics, President Harry Truman, whom no one thought
of as an intellectual, was a voracious reader of heavyweight stuff like
Thucydides and read Cicero in the original Latin. When Chief Justice Carl
Vinson quoted in Latin, Truman was able to correct him.
Yet intellectuals tended to think of the unpretentious and plain-spoken
Truman as little more than a country bumpkin.
Similarly, no one ever thought of President Calvin Coolidge as an
intellectual. Yet Coolidge also read the classics in the White House. He
read both Latin and Greek, and read Dante in the original Italian, since
he spoke several languages. It was said that the taciturn Coolidge could
be silent in five different languages.
The intellectual levels of politicians are just one of the many things
that intellectuals have grossly misjudged for years on end.
During the 1930s, some of the leading intellectuals in America condemned
our economic system and pointed to the centrally planned Soviet economy as
a model -- all this at a time when literally millions of people were
starving to death in the Soviet Union, from a famine in a country with
some of the richest farmland in Europe and historically a large exporter
of food.
New York Times Moscow correspondent Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer
Prize for telling the intelligentsia what they wanted to hear -- that
claims of starvation in the Ukraine were false.
After British journalist Malcolm Muggeridge reported from the Ukraine on
the massive deaths from starvation there, he was ostracized after
returning to England and unable to find a job.
More than half a century later, when the archives of the Soviet Union were
finally opened up under Mikhail Gorbachev, it turned out that about six
million people had died in that famine -- about the same number as the
people killed in Hitler's Holocaust.
In the 1930s, it was the intellectuals who pooh-poohed the dangers from
the rise of Hitler and urged Western disarmament.
It would be no feat to fill a big book with all the things on which
intellectuals were grossly mistaken, just in the 20th century -- far more
so than ordinary people.
History fully vindicates the late William F. Buckley's view that he would
rather be ruled by people represented by the first 100 names in the Boston
phone book than by the faculty of Harvard.
How have intellectuals managed to be so wrong, so often? By thinking that
because they are knowledgeable -- or even expert -- within some narrow
band out of the vast spectrum of human concerns, that makes them wise
guides to the masses and to the rulers of the nation.
But the ignorance of Ph.D.s is still ignorance and high-IQ groupthink is
still groupthink, which is the antithesis of real thinking.
COPYRIGHT 2008
CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Thomas
Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA 94305.
Opinions expressed
in 'Perspectives' columns published by OneNewsNow.com are the sole
responsibility of the article's author(s), or of the person(s) or
organization(s) quoted therein, and do not necessarily represent those of
the staff or management of, or advertisers who support the American Family
News Network, OneNewsNow.com, our parent organization or its other
affiliates.
All Original Content
Copyright 2006-2008 American Family
News Network - All Rights Reserved
|